• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. DJO SURGICAL; ALTIVATE REVERSE, SMALL HEMI-ADAPTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. DJO SURGICAL; ALTIVATE REVERSE, SMALL HEMI-ADAPTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 533-01-002
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Unspecified Infection (1930)
Date of Event 08/12/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
 
Event or Problem Description
Revision surgery - due to infection.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
See d3, d4 expiration date, g1, h4 and h11.The reason for this revision surgery, the agent reported "(i & d washout for post op infection, removable implants were replaced)".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 17 days apart.This evaluation is limited in scope as limited information was provided to djo surgical - austin for review.If information regarding cultures identified in the infection, the severity of the infection or any other relevant information is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were the source or had a direct connection with the patient's infection.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.First, there was an ncmr#51980 associated with the concomitant part # 520-46-024, head, humeral, neutral, 46-24 which document that out of 20 parts lot, 2 parts were rejected due to multiple scratches on the a area.Later, the rejected parts were reworked and retouched via spar after proper justification.Second, there was an ncmr#52117 associated with the same part, which document that out of 20 parts lot, 1 part was rejected due to 2000.2194 nicks can be felt withfg587.Rough surface finish with 2 nicks around rim.Later, the rejected parts were reworked and retouched via spar after proper justification.Third, there was an ncmr#52352 associated with the same part, which document that out of 20 parts lot, 2 parts were rejected due to scratches on polish area.Later, the rejected parts were reworked and retouched via spar after proper justification.All other items in the respective lots were met with fit, form and function requirements.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.The revision surgery was completed successfully.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to an infection.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the possible infection or inhibited the patient's immune system.Due to the short time between the original surgery and the revision, it is possible that the infection was acquired in the hospital (nosocomial).It is also possible that the patient was not compliant with post-surgical instructions.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an infection that are outside the control of djo surgical.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DJO SURGICAL
Common Device Name
ALTIVATE REVERSE, SMALL HEMI-ADAPTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin TX 78758
Manufacturer Contact
stacey bonnell
9800 metric blvd
austin, TX 78758
MDR Report Key20164366
Report Number1644408-2024-01342
Device Sequence Number12604018
Product Code KWS
UDI-Device Identifier00190446257714
UDI-Public00190446257714
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K172351
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/30/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number533-01-002
Device Lot Number010Y1095
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/12/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/30/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/06/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
520-46-024 LOT: 921C1093A
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-