|
Additional information is provided in sections d.9, h.3, h.6 and h.11.One opened slit knife, in sheathing, in blister was received for the report of slit knife was dull.Sample was visually inspected and found to be non-conforming with damaged cutting edge.Penetration testing could not be performed due to the damage of the sample.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot numbers, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.The exact root cause could not be determined from the investigation performed.The returned sample is visually non-conforming with the damaged cutting edge; therefore, a dull knife prior to patient contact damaged was confirmed; however, how and when the knife not sharp could not be determined.The damage to the returned sample is consistent with damage that can occur when the blade contacts a hard surface such as the protective blade tray when product is improperly removed or inserted after use, or improper handling, or contact with another instrument during surgery or set-up.The exact root cause for the damaged knife sample is unknown, therefore specific action with regards to this complaint cannot be taken.All knives are 100% inspected by trained operators using a minimum of 10x magnification during manufacturing.Any nonconformance, such as the damaged tip and damaged cutting edge exhibited on the returned opened sample, is removed from the lot and scrapped.Functional penetration testing is performed and monitored during the finishing process to ensure the sharpness of the product.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|