|
LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED PTA DILATATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
9010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Aneurysm (1708); Stenosis (2263); Pseudoaneurysm (2605); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Restenosis (4576)
|
| Date of Event |
06/27/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that sometime post an index procedure completion using a drug-coated balloon catheter in the cephalic vein at outflow near cannulation zone via the left upper arm, the subject had adverse event of pseudoaneurysm on pre-dilation and aneurysm on cephalic vein.It was further reported that one month and eleven days after index procedure, the subject had serious adverse event due to cephalic vein restenosis and access circuit thrombosis which required an arteriovenous access circuit reintervention.Furthermore, one month and nineteen days after index procedure, standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure was performed to treat cephalic vein restenosis and access circuit thrombosis.Treatment reintervention was successful, new access was not created, and the outcome of the serious adverse event was resolved.Reportedly, there have been no documented device deficiencies reported for this subject to date.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2025) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that sometime post an index procedure completion using a drug-coated balloon catheter in the cephalic vein at outflow near cannulation zone via the left upper arm, the subject had adverse event of pseudoaneurysm on pre-dilation and aneurysm on cephalic vein.It was further reported that one month and eleven days after index procedure, the subject had serious adverse event due to cephalic vein restenosis and access circuit thrombosis which required an arteriovenous access circuit reintervention.Furthermore, one month and nineteen days after index procedure, standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure was performed to treat cephalic vein restenosis and access circuit thrombosis.Treatment reintervention was successful, new access was not created, and the outcome of the serious adverse event was resolved.Reportedly, there have been no documented device deficiencies reported for this subject to date.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|