|
It was reported that the delivery wire of a retracta detachable embolization coil unraveled.The device was required for a left internal iliac artery aneurysm embolization prior to graft placement.During the procedure, the delivery wire was advanced partially into the catheter when the hub of delivery cannula was inadvertently pulled on, separated, and could not be reattached.The delivery wire was then retracted toward the delivery cannula when a 5 cm portion began to elongate and unravel.The device was removed from the patient and discarded.A second retracta coil was opened and experienced delivery cannula hub separation.Finally, a third coil was obtained and was successfully deployed.A representative was present for the procedure.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation it was reported that the delivery wire of a retracta detachable embolization coil unraveled.The device was required for a left internal iliac artery aneurysm embolization prior to graft placement.During the procedure, the delivery wire was advanced partially into the catheter when the hub of delivery cannula was inadvertently pulled on, separated, and could not be reattached.The delivery wire was then retracted toward the delivery cannula when a 5 cm portion began to elongate and unravel.The device was removed from the patient and discarded.A second retracta coil was opened and experienced delivery cannula hub separation.Finally, a third coil was obtained and was successfully deployed.A representative was present for the procedure.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.Reviews of the documentation, including the complaint history, device history record, quality control procedures, and instructions for use (ifu) for device, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a physical examination could not be conducted.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the device found no relevant nonconformances that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.It should be noted that there as one other complaint associated with the final product lot number from the same customer for a different failure on the same date.Cook also reviewed product labeling: the current instructions for use [t_mwcer_rev6] state the following: "under fluoroscopic visualization, slowly advance the delivery wire until the entire length of coil exits the distal end of the catheter.Ensure that the junction remains positioned just inside the catheter tip.Note: advancing the delivery wire slowly allows the junction to be seen more easily and reduces the risk of damaging it.Note: if significant resistance is encountered during coil advancement, do not continue advancing.Retract the delivery wire slightly, then gently re-advance it.If there is still significant resistance, withdraw the delivery wire from the catheter and try using a new coil with a shorter length." evidence gathered upon review of the dmr, ifu, and the dhr suggests that the device was not manufactured out of specification, and that there are no nonconforming devices in house or out in the field.Based on the information provided, no product returned, and the results of our investigation, it was concluded that a component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to the reported event.It is possible that manipulation of the device contributed to the wire unraveling, but this could not be definitively confirmed.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|