• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number CH-1400-02H
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 10/28/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Event or Problem Description
A review of the recipient¿s test data indicated impedance issues.Revision surgery is scheduled.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history record was performed at the request of the nca and no anomalies were noted.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The recipient's device was explanted.The recipient was re-implanted with another advanced bionics cochlear device.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information section d.9.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Advanced bionics considers the investigation into this reportable event as closed.The external visual inspection revealed tool damage to the silicone overmold on the top and bottom covers, as well as a severed electrode.This is believed to have occurred during revision surgery.The device passed photographic imaging inspection.System lock was verified.The condition of the electrode prevented an electrical test from being performed.The device passed the electrical tests performed.The device passed the mechanical tests performed.The scanning electron microscopy (sem) analysis revealed damaged insulation on an electrode.It is believed that the paralyne wire insulation damage found on the electrode wire is the source of the shorts reported.The damage found on electrode e16 is consistent with the electrode identified with the short prior to explanation.A corrective action was implemented.This version of the hires 90k device is no longer distributed.This is the final report.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
28515 westinghouse place
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
laurel masamitsu
28515 westinghouse place
valencia, CA 91355
MDR Report Key20208069
Report Number3006556115-2024-01375
Device Sequence Number6674625
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier07630016816260
UDI-Public(01)07630016816260(11)150625(17)170630
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
P960058
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/28/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2017
Device Model NumberCH-1400-02H
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/12/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/17/2024
11/22/2024
07/31/2025
10/23/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age16 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-