• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. NV GXL LNR, NEUTRAL, 32MM ID, GROUP 3 CUPS; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. NV GXL LNR, NEUTRAL, 32MM ID, GROUP 3 CUPS; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 130-32-53
Medical Device Problem Code Naturally Worn (2988)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Osteolysis (2377)
Date of Event 08/29/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(h3) pending evaluation (d10) concomitant device(s): (b)(6) 180-01-58 - crown cup,cluster-hole gr.58.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this male patient's hip was revised approximately 4 years 6 months post op.The patient had a hip prosthesis cup from exactech implanted.During the course of the procedure, the stem became loose and sintered, which is why a stem replacement operation was carried out, during which the cup inlay was also replaced (old: novation crown cup, connexion gxl, neutral liner, group 3, 32mm).As part of the manufacturer's recall, the patient came in for a check-up.The x-ray and ct scan showed a slight decentration of the prosthesis head, small osteolyses in the acetabulum and a larger osteolysis in the stem area as signs of inlay wear.This was verified during an inlay change to a vit e-hardened, specially approved inlay (novation xle, neutral liner, group 3, 36 mm).As part of the replacement operation, in addition to the inlay exchange, the firm integrity of the cup and shaft was determined, the cysts in the cup bed were curettaged and filled using hydroxyapatite + calcium (ceramic bone void filler) and the prosthesis head was replaced.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: h3, h6.H3: the reported event was unable to be confirmed due to limited information received from the customer.No device was returned for evaluation; further, photographs and/or radiograph images were not provided for review.Operative notes and/or medical records were not provided for review of usage/ technique.A review of manufacturing data was performed and no discrepancies were found.A review of complaint history determined that no further action is required as no trends were identified.A definitive root cause was unable to be determined; however, the revision reported may have been due to a combination of risk factors specified in an hhe including but not limited to use error, implant positioning, and patient factors.However, this cannot be confirmed because the components were not returned to exactech for evaluation and no images or pre-revision radiographs were provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The product associated with the reported event is within the scope of recall z-1729-2022; however, there is insufficient information to evaluate whether the subject issue of the recall was a cause or contributor to the reported event.The following sections were updated: e1 the following sections were corrected: b2 d1 d4: catalog number and udi based on the available information, the revision reported may have been due to a combination of risk factors such as use error, implant positioning, implant size selection, and patient factors (fitness for surgery, biomechanics, activity level and local tissue oxidation potential) including but not limited to use error, implant positioning, and patient factors.However, this cannot be confirmed because the components were not returned to exactech for evaluation and no images or pre-revision radiographs were provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NV GXL LNR, NEUTRAL, 32MM ID, GROUP 3 CUPS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH
2320 nw 66th court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66th court
gainesville, FL 32653
3523771140
MDR Report Key20233573
Report Number1038671-2024-03549
Device Sequence Number15487454
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier10885862022172
UDI-Public10885862022172
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K070479
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/22/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/07/2023
Device Catalogue Number130-32-53
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/29/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/13/2024
12/13/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/16/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/31/2024
01/22/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/09/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient SexMale
-
-