|
ETHICON INC. SURGICEL NU-KNIT 3INX4IN(7.6CMX10.2CM); AGENT, ABSORBABLE HEMOSTATIC, NON-COLLAGEN BASED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1943 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Abscess (1690)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a colectomy procedure on an unknown date fibrin sealant was used.Two patients in a lap colectomy procedure that the fibrin sealant was used on liver bed for bleeding, but the patient had gotten abscess that needed to be drained.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).H6.Component code: g07002 - device not returned.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? 2.What is the date of index surgical procedure? 3.What were the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? 4.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.5.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? 6.What is the lot number? 7.What was the intended use of the surgicel? was it used to address active bleeding or used prophylactically? 8.Where was the surgicel used (on what tissue)? 9.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? 10.Was the surgicel product left in place? was the excess irrigated and removed? 11.What were current symptoms following the index surgical procedure? onset date? 12.Has any further surgical or medical intervention been performed? 13.What is physician¿s opinion as to the cause of or contributing factors to this abscess? 14.Was there an alleged deficiency of the surgicel that contributed to the patient¿s post-operative abscess? 15.What is the patient¿s current status? 16.What is the users experience w/ surgicel powder and other hemostatic agents? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Corrected information: b 5.Event description.Corrected b5 narrative: it was reported that a patient underwent a colectomy procedure on an unknown date absorbable hemostat was used.Two patients the in a lap colectomy procedure that the fibrin sealant was used on liver bed for bleeding, but the patient had gotten abscess that needed to be drain.Additional information was requested.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information: b 7.Medical history/preexisting condition.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: 1.What is the date of index surgical procedure? (b)(6)2024.2.What were the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? elective gall bladder removal, history of gall stones.3.What was the intended use of the surgicel? was it used to address active bleeding or used prophylactically? active bleeding.4.Where was the surgicel used (on what tissue)? on the liver bed.5.How much surgicel was used during the procedure? he wasn't sure how much of the sheet he was given.6.Was the surgicel product left in place? was the excess irrigated and removed? yes, it was left in place, no excess because there was no powder.7.Has any further surgical or medical intervention been performed? had to have a drain inserted.8.What is physician¿s opinion as to the cause of or contributing factors to this abscess? this patient there was a gall bladder was pierced in surgery, need to suction out bile and arrogate.9.Was there an alleged deficiency of the surgicel that contributed to the patient¿s post-operative abscess? no he does not have any deficiency.10.What is the patient¿s current status? doctor said he is fine.11.What is the users experience w/ surgicel and other hemostatic agents? long experience with surgicel family, nu-knit is newer to doctor.The following information was requested, but unavailable: 1.Please provide the following patient demographic information, if available: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure? n/a.2.Please provide any relevant patient history: patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions), all concomitant medications, past medical history, any treatment required for events, dose, frequency, and therapy dates.N/a.3.Was there any intraoperative concurrent use of other products? n/a.4.What is the lot number? n/a.5.What were current symptoms following the index surgical procedure? onset date? n/a.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|