• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM PRIME BRPL HLX; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM PRIME BRPL HLX; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number APB-1.5-1-HX-ES
Medical Device Problem Codes Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/14/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id unk-nv-echelon, (lot: unknown); product type: ; implant date n/a; explant date n/a, medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that an axium coil encountered resistance in the echelon catheter and prematurely detached.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured aneurysm of the ophthalmic artery with a max diameter of 3mm and a 3mm neck diameter.It was noted the patient's blood flow was normal and vessel tortuosity was normal.It was reported that after the microcatheter was in place, the spring coil was prepared to be delivered.After the spring coil entered the tail end of the echelon 10 microcatheter, it was found that it could not be delivered further.After multiple attempts, it still could not move forward.The spring coil was withdrawn and found to have automatically stretched.The coil was removed from the patient.There was no surgical or medicinal intervention required.There was friction or difficulty during delivery.The physician did not reposition the coil or attempt to detach the coil.The physician did not rotate the delivery pusher during the procedure.Continuous flush was administered during the procedure.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).No patient symptoms or complications were associated with this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received reported after the withdrawal, a new coil was replaced and successfully inserted into the diseased area, completing the operation.No detachment attempts were made.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis # (b)(4): equipment used: video inspection system (m-85519), ruler (m-83361), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5 as found condition: the axium prime device was returned for analysis within a shipping box; within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch; within a dispenser coil and within an introducer sheath.The echelon-10 micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: no damages or irregularities were found with the introducer sheath.The actuator interface was found securely attached to the coupler tube.The break indicator was found unbroken.No evidence of detachment attempts was found at these locations.No damages or irregularities were found with axium prime pusher.The axium prime implant coil was found still attached to the pusher (figure e) and found stretched within the introducer sheath with the polypropylene filament broken (figures e <(><<)>(><(>&<)><(><<)>)> f).The implant was found unbroken (as evident due to distal tip still attached) (figure f).Testing/analysis: the axium prime coil could not be used for resistance testing due to the damaged condition.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer report of ¿premature detach¿ could not be confirmed.The implant was still attached to the pusher and the implant was found unbroken.The customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in catheter¿ was confirmed as the damages found is consistent with resistance.Possible causes for coil resistance in catheter are, but not limited to, lack of hydration before procedure, user does not maintain continuous flush, damaged micro catheter, or tortuous anatomy.The returned axium prime coil was found stretched.The customer did not report the finding damages during preparation per ifu; therefore, it is likely the damage occurred due to advancing against the reported resistance.Customer reported devices were prepared per ifu, and vessel tortuosity as normal.Therefore, the root cause could not be determined.As the echelon-10 micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the echelon-10 micro catheter towards the resistance could not be assessed.The axium prime coil is compatible for use with the echelon-10 micro catheter.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM PRIME BRPL HLX
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key20246657
Report Number9617601-2024-00188
Device Sequence Number7397867
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00763000313814
UDI-Public00763000313814
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K151447
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/22/2026
Device Model NumberAPB-1.5-1-HX-ES
Device Catalogue NumberAPB-1.5-1-HX-ES
Device Lot Number227179078
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/14/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/23/2024
11/08/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/18/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/11/2024
12/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/22/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H11...
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight87 KG
-
-