|
|
| Catalog Number |
74122546 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Medical device site infection (4845)
|
| Date of Event |
08/28/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after a tha surgery was performed in an unknown date, the patient experienced infection.To address this adverse event, the patient underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2024, during which a hemi head 46mm was removed and replaced with a tandem unipolar 46mm, while retaining the shell, r3 liner and stem.It was mentioned that the patient was in bad shape for unspecified reasons.The patient current health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: it was reported that after a total hip arthroplasty surgery was performed, the patient experienced infection.To address this adverse event, the patient underwent a revision surgery, during which a hemi head 46mm was removed and replaced with a tandem unipolar 46mm, while retaining the shell, r3 liner and stem.It was mentioned that the patient was in bad shape for unspecified reasons.The patient current health status is unknown.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the alleged devices.A review of historical complaints data was performed using the part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.No other similar complaints have been identified for the hemi head.This failure will continue to be monitored via routine trending.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, manufacturing record review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The review of the most recent ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.There is a definitive clinical route cause.The reported revision was due to the infection which is highly likely of an exogenous nature, and it cannot be concluded the reported infection is related to the implant.The patient impact beyond the reported revision could not be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are damage to the package during transport or handling, prolonged surgical time, contaminated surgical environment and/or instruments, insufficient care of the surgical wound, incorrect and/or insufficient use of prophylactic antibiotics, excessive patient weight, patient smoking, patient compromised immune system.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|