| Catalog Number |
J346H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/25/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information: h6 component code: g07002 - device not returned.Additional information has been requested however not received.Attempts to obtain the device have been made.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Were there any patient consequences? were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)? what measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece? was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece? status of product return.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2024 and suture was used.Surgeon suturing wound bed closed and second needle broke during use and lodged into patient's tissue; was searched for and recovered from patient's back.All pieces accounted for and none left in patient.All pieces accounted for and removed from sterile field.No other details provided.Additional information has been requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: ¿ were there any patient consequences? none reported.¿ were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)? no.All pieces were retrieved.¿ what measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece? no further measure taken.All needles were retrieved.¿ was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece? none reported.¿ status of product return returned.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H3 investigation summary: the product received for analysis was identified as product code j346h.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed in the body of sample b.One side of sample b was received, the mating fracture surface was not provided for this evaluation.The needle was noted with marks that appears to be by surgical instrument.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needles.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of the sample revealed the fractures were predominantly composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile overload failure.Mechanical damage was observed coincidental to the fracture on the sample.Sample b was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred from mechanical deformation, indents and scratches, due to gripping, bending and overstressing of the needle.There is no evidence of any material flaw that would cause premature failure.The needle breakage was confirmed.Device received for analysis on 9/24/2024.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|