| Catalog Number |
5703690 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Restricted Flow rate (1248); Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Obstruction of Flow (2423)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
08/09/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: (expiry date: 10/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that approximately four years post dialysis catheter placement, the device allegedly had poor flow of hemodialysis catheter.It was further reported that the cephalic end is blocked by fibrin sheath and blood clots in the body.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported device allegedly had poor flow of hemodialysis catheter and the cephalic end is blocked by fibrin sheath and blood clots in the body as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3, h6 (method).H11: d4 (unique identifier (udi) #).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that approximately four years post a dialysis catheter placement, the device allegedly had poor flow of hemodialysis catheter.It was further reported that the cephalic end was allegedly blocked by fibrin sheath and blood clots in the body.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|