|
EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIBIA IMPLANT PSC INSERT, SZ 3, 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
02-012-44-3009 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Osteolysis (2377); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
08/15/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Legal case ¿ usa: (b)(4) is associated with this case.It was reported that approximately 125 months after a left total knee replacement procedure, the patient has experienced prosthesis wear.No further issues or complications were reported.No additional information is available.The serial number (b)(6) is confirmed to be a part of recall number: z-0021-2022 or the serial number (b)(6) is confirmed to be a part of recall number: z-0021-2022.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Concomitants: "(b)(6) 02-010-01-0230 - logic femoral ps cem left sz 3.(b)(6) 02-012-41-3030 - logic tibia traptray cem sz 3f/3t.(b)(6) 200-02-32 - three peg patella 32mm.The product associated with the reported event is within the scope of recall z-0021-2022.However, there is insufficient information to evaluate whether the subject issue of the recall was a cause or contributor to the reported event.The device was not returned for evaluation and no medical or other records containing treatment information or patient information have been received; therefore, the reported event cannot be confirmed, nor can the circumstances or potential causes or contributors to the alleged event be evaluated.Should additional, material information become available that permits more analysis or conclusions, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reason for the revision reported cannot be confirmed from the information provided but may be the result of prosthesis wear or due to inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Additionally, these devices appear to have been implanted for over ten years prior to the reported event.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and images and radiographs were not provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|