|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication related to a product problem with a smith+nephew device.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
|
It was reported that after undergoing a thr on (b)(6) 2024, patient experienced dislocation.This happened three times.Surgeon suspected was alcohol misused and did not fault the implants.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery on (b)(6) 2024, in which the liner, shell and head were exchanged.Surgeon converted to j&j constrained liner.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
|
H3, h6: the devices were not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided the clinical root cause of the reported right hip dislocation could not be determined and we are currently unable to rule out the patient¿s history noting two prior dislocations and the reported alcohol misuse as contributing factors to the reported event.There is no evidence to support that there was a device malfunction of the smith & nephew device.An undated x-ray image was provided for review, which confirms the dislocation of right hip.The patient impact is determined to be the revision, and a brief post-operative recovery phase would be anticipated.A review of the production orders did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed a similar event for the acetabular liner and shell over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batches based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.For the femoral head, the complaint history review for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events.A review of the instructions for use documents for the total hip systems reveals for preoperative warnings and precautions that improper neck selection, positioning, looseness of acetabular or femoral components, extraneous bone, penetration of the femoral prosthesis through the shaft of the femur, fracture of the acetabulum, intrapelvic protrusion of acetabular component, femoral impingement, periarticular calcification, and/or excessive reaming may increase the risk of dislocations, subluxation, decreased range of motion, or lengthening or shortening of the femur, which may lead to revision surgery.The intraoperative warnings and precautions indicate that muscle looseness and/or malpositioning of components may result in loosening, subluxation and dislocation.Additionally, ectopic bone and/or bone spurs may lead to dislocation and painful or restricted motion and proper positioning of the components is important to minimize impingement which could lead to early failure, premature wear, device related noise, and/or dislocation, all of which may lead to revision surgery.Postoperative warnings and precautions highlight the need of warning patients against unassisted activity, particularly use of toilet facilities and other activities that require excessive motion of the hip, as they may result in subluxation or dislocation.A review of the risk management files revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to these products and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|