• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. OPTETRAK ASY,CR CEMENTED FEMORAL, SZ 2,; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. OPTETRAK ASY,CR CEMENTED FEMORAL, SZ 2,; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 230-03-02
Medical Device Problem Code Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Osteolysis (2377); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Implant Pain (4561)
Date of Event 09/05/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Pending investigation.D10: 7207971 02-022-47-2009 - truliant tib imp cr ins std sz 2, 9mm.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, approximately 10 months post the previous revision surgery, the patient had knee pain and the surgeon decided to revise again because the femoral and tibial components had been found to be loose.Metallosis was found and all proliferative tissue removed, then all components were replaced to competitor devices.There was no reported breakage of a device or surgical delay/prolongation.The patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Report number: 1038671-2024-03688 this follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.D10 concomitants: 7207971 02-022-47-2009 - truliant tib imp cr ins std sz 2, 9mm.2459795 - 00-5071-129-00 - 105x19.5x1.27mm.The reason for the patient¿s second revision reported was likely the result of loosening between the tibial and femoral implants and the bone after almost 11 years of implantation.Osteolysis, and possibly loosening, on both the tibial and femoral sides appears to have been present at the time of the first revision.As the tibial insert had been recently revised, the articular surface damage is likely consistent with third-body wear secondary to loosening and non-articular damage secondary to femoral subsidence.However, this cannot be confirmed as the devices were not returned.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPTETRAK ASY,CR CEMENTED FEMORAL, SZ 2,
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville, FL 32653
3523771140
MDR Report Key20320362
Report Number1038671-2024-03689
Device Sequence Number15490597
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862061744
UDI-Public10885862061744
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K032606
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2013
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/08/2018
Device Catalogue Number230-03-02
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/09/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/10/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/27/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/11/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/12/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H11; SEE H11
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-