• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG GAV 2.0 SYS W/PED.CONTROL RESERV.5/25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG GAV 2.0 SYS W/PED.CONTROL RESERV.5/25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX153T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 08/22/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valves were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.He valve is tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the gav 2.0 operates within the accepted tolerance in the vertical but not in the horizontal position.A slowed outflow of gav 2.0 could be determined.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the components, deposits were found inside.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine a slower flow rate at the gav 2.0 in the horizontal position.The deposits visible in the valve are the cause of the change in flow rate.Deposits caused by natural substances in the body, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and unavoidable risks and side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.Even small amounts of proteins can impair the integrity of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a gav 2.0 shunt system (#fx153t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.According to the complainant, the shunt system showed an under-drainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.The complainant device has returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 6 months; weight: 4.9 kgs; height: 57 cm; gender: female.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GAV 2.0 SYS W/PED.CONTROL RESERV.5/25
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key20320759
Report Number3004721439-2024-00292
Device Sequence Number15399417
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906142926
UDI-Public4041906142926
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 09/27/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX153T
Device Catalogue NumberFX153T
Device Lot Number20062058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/02/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/02/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/04/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 MO
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight5 KG
-
-