| Model Number |
AR40E |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
|
| Date of Event |
08/22/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a monofocal intraocular lens (iol) was fully inserted into a patient's left eye and removed as the capsule tore and the doctor had to do a vitrectomy and use suture.A non-johnson and johnson lens was inserted as a replacement.The issue was noted after insertion of the lens.There was no injury reported and the patient is doing fine.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a5 and a6: unknown/asked but unavailable (asku).Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section h6: health effect - impact code: 4625 - additional surgery (suture & unplanned vitrectomy).Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed, and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no other complaints were received from this production order.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, the definite information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: oct 9, 2024 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was cut and coated in viscoelastic residue.One haptic was detached and missing, the lens was cleaned and inspected, and no further issues were identified.The lens was dropped during handling resulting in damage to the lens.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issues were not identified during product evaluation.The observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the investigation, no malfunction or product deficiency was identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data: in review, it was noticed that the sentence "the lens was dropped during handling resulting in damage to the lens." which entered in the "device evaluation" of section "h11" of the follow-up mdr report #1 was incorrect.Therefore, the information has been corrected in this supplemental mdr report as indicated below and accordingly: device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was cut and coated in viscoelastic residue.One haptic was detached and missing, the lens was cleaned and inspected, and no further issues were identified.After evaluation (during handling), the lens was dropped resulting in damage to the lens; the lens was not received damaged or observed to be damaged prior to this incident.No further evaluation was performed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|