• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC FLAT CUT TALAR DOME SZ 3 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC FLAT CUT TALAR DOME SZ 3 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33680033
Medical Device Problem Code Osseointegration Problem (3003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Limb Fracture (4518)
Date of Event 09/03/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery of both the tibial and talar components due to subsidence.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery of both the tibial and talar components due to subsidence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could be confirmed, since review of the available imaging does find that both the talar and tibial component are loose and subsided.Medical affairs reviewed the available information and determined the following: the loosening and subsidence of both the talar and the tibial component can be confirmed with the provided ct-scan.The short time period between the implantation and the failure is a little surprising, but there is no information given, that an infection or something specific led to the failure.The provided information is not very comprehensive.It is likely, that no consolidation/ingrowth of the implant occurred at all.A periprosthetic fracture seems to have occurred-that seems to have partly consolidated.The alternative is that due to missing union/bony integration excessive bone growth has occurred.Without further information this cannot be assessed.Failure of total ankle replacement (tar) over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient (radiological and clinical) information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information (e.G.Clinical status, exact symptoms and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician) is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and/or the device in relation to cause of the failure.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLAT CUT TALAR DOME SZ 3 INFINITY ADAPTIS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key20350682
Report Number3010667733-2024-00664
Device Sequence Number8062400
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00889797073073
UDI-Public00889797073073
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K191393
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/27/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33680033
Device Lot Number1765645
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/03/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/05/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/02/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/24/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-