| Catalog Number |
U42001H8RX |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Failure to Advance (2524); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
09/05/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 10/2025) h11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the pta balloon was allegedly did not break but the support shaft broke.It was further reported that the distal balloon was detached by virtue of the mid-shaft break.Reportedly, the detached component required open cut-down and retrieval.The procedure was completed using another balloon.The current status of the patient is stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.Two photos were received and reviewed.The first photo shows the outer packaging box of ultraverse rx.The labeling details in the box matched with the details provided in trackwise.The second photo shows the ultraverse rx balloon catheter with blood residues.The detachment is noted in the proximal end of the balloon.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported detachment issue as detachment was noted in the proximal end of the balloon.However, the investigation remains inconclusive for the reported lesion advancement issue as no objective evidence was provided for review.A definitive root cause for the alleged detachment issue and lesion advancement issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3, h6 (method).H11: b5, d4 (unique identifier (udi) #), h6 (device, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, allegedly there was resistance when advancing the balloon up, over the aortic bifurcation when the support shaft of pta balloon was allegedly broken.It was further reported that the distal balloon was detached by virtue of the mid-shaft break.Reportedly, the detached component required open cut-down and retrieval.The procedure was completed using another balloon.The current status of the patient is stable.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|