|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging phlegm in throat.There is no allegation of serious or permanent harm or injury.No medical intervention was required by the patient.The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.
|
|
The manufacturer previously reported: "the manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging phlegm in throat.There is no allegation of serious or permanent harm or injury.No medical intervention was required by the patient.The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete." the product associated with this complaint was not returned to the manufacturer.This report is being sent to conclude that no further investigation is possible.No device has been returned.No further evaluation is possible at this time.Multiple attempts to have the device returned for evaluation and investigation were unsuccessful.In addition, capa pr 7211 documents the investigation into similar complaints, correction/removal activities have been initiated (refer to h.9), and complaint code trending is reviewed on a periodic basis to evaluate field quality performance, and as an input to risk management activities.In the previous report, the udi was omitted; it has been completed in this report.In addition, the following codes: evaluation method, evaluation results, component, and conclusion code.
|