|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, the tip of the wire guide included in neff percutaneous access set broke off at the biliary orifice during treatment of jaundice for a (b)(6) -year-old female patient.The surgeon removed the wire guide along with the catheter and replaced it in a timely manner.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding the event has been requested but is currently unavailable.
|
|
In additional information received on 16oct2024, it was reported that the device will not be returned for the investigation, as it was discarded by the complaint facility.The wire was manipulated and/or withdrawn through the needle.There was difficulty experienced when advancing the wire guide through the needle.There was no difficulty advancing the introducer set over the wire guide.The patient did not have tortuous anatomy.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged or unavailable.Correction: h1.Investigation ¿ evaluation: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, the tip of the wire guide included in neff percutaneous access set broke off at the biliary orifice during treatment of jaundice for a 90-year-old female patient.The surgeon removed the wire guide along with the catheter and replaced it in a timely manner.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.Reviews of the documentation, including the complaint history, device history record, quality control procedures, and manufacturing instructions (mi) of the device, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a physical examination could not be conducted.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities area in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the device found one relevant nonconformance that could have contributed to the reported failure mode, in which all nonconforming material was scrapped.It should be noted that there were no other complaints associated with the final product lot number.Cook was unable to review the device labeling, as an ifu pamphlet is not included with the complaint device.Evidence gathered upon review of dmr, product labeling, and dhr, does not indicate the device was manufactured out of specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming material in house or in the field.Based on the information provided, no product returned, and the results of our investigation, cook concluded that the cause of event to be an unintended use error.It is possible that the wire guide was partially damaged by the needle and was not noticed until placing the nssw sheath device.When the customer was attempting to withdraw the wire guide, it hit the distal tip of the sheath device and broke off.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|