|
E1/establishment name: (b)(6) hospital affiliated to (b)(6) university school of medicine added here due to character limitation in respective field.This report is related to the following linked patient identifier: (b)(6).The device was not returned.Attempts were performed to obtain additional information, but no response was received.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled, "efficacy and long-term outcomes of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted treatment for biliary obstruction after choledochojejunostomy." literature summary: background: to evaluate the long-term efficacy of single-balloon enteroscopy endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (sbeerc) for the treatment of biliary obstruction and to analyze the factors affecting the recurrence of benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture after sbe-erc treatment.Methods: the clinical data of patients with biliary diseases treated with sbe-erc after choledochojejunostomy in our hospital from (b)(6) 2015 to (b)(6) 2021 were analyzed retrospectively for the success rates of diagnosis and treatment and the incidence of complications.Patients who were diagnosed with benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture were followed up.The independent factors affecting recurrence were obtained by univariate and multivariate analyses using the kaplan meier method and cox proportional hazard regression model.Results: a total of (b)(4) sbe-ercs were performed in (b)(4) patients.The overall success rate was (b)(4)).The incidence of postoperative complications was (b)(4).The (b)(4) successfully treated patients diagnosed with benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture were followed up.(b)(4) of patients had recurrent stricture after sbeerc.The biliary patency rates at 1 year, 2 years and 5 years after sbe-erc were (b)(4), respectively.Single-factor analysis revealed the absence of intrahepatic biliary gas imaging during endoscopy (x2=(b)(4), p = (b)(4)), a diameter of balloon dilatation during the last endoscopic treatment less than 0.8 cm (x2=(b)(4), p = (b)(4)), and the presence of a thread in the anastomosis (x2=(b)(4), p = (b)(4)) as risk factors for recurrence.A non-indwelling biliary plastic stent (x2=(b)(4), p < (b)(4)) and undergoing only one ercp treatment (x2=(b)(4), p = (b)(4)) were risk factors for the recurrence of benign stricture after sbe-erc resection.Multivariate analysis revealed that the absence of a stent (hr = (b)(4), p = (b)(4)), absence of intrahepatic biliary gas imaging during endoscopy (hr = (b)(4), p = (b)(4)) and the presence of a thread in the anastomosis (hr = (b)(4), p = (b)(4)) were independent risk factors for stricture recurrence.Conclusions: treating biliary disease after choledochojejunostomy with sbe-erc is safe and effective, with a good immediate technical success rate and an acceptable incidence of complications.Sbe-erc has long-term efficacy in the treatment of benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture.The absence of intrahepatic biliary gas imaging during endoscopy, non-indwelling biliary stents and the existence of anastomotic threads are independent risk factors for the recurrence of benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture.Type of adverse events/number of patients: cholangitis ((b)(4) patients).Gastrointestinal perforation ((b)(4) patients).In the cases of postoperative cholangitis (incidence of (b)(4)), the patients had fever, chills and increased white blood cells after the operation, which improved after the use of antibiotics and hepatic protective drugs.In the cases for gastrointestinal perforation (incidence of (b)(4)), one patient had a small intestinal perforation due to a twisted input loop near the transverse colonic mesenteric poke and was converted to laparotomy.In the other patient, the endoscope failed to enter due to severe adhesion of the small intestine at the input loop, and the patient experienced aggravated abdominal pain after the operation.An exploratory laparotomy was performed 3 days after sbe-erc.The small intestine laceration of the input loop was found and sutured.
|
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation and to provide additional information received from the author (b5).The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse events cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|