|
|
| Model Number |
AH760HBT |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Degraded (1153)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Headache (1880); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Inflammation (1932); Liver Damage/Dysfunction (1954); Dizziness (2194); Respiratory Tract Infection (2420); Unspecified Heart Problem (4454); Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem (4503); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545); Eye Irritation (4803)
|
| Date of Event |
10/09/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice/recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a bipap device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged liver disease/toxicity, reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, eye irritation, nose irritation, skin irritation, respiratory tract irritation, dizziness and/or headache, hypersensitivity, nausea/vomiting, inflammatory response.Medical intervention was not specified.No additional information can be requested at this time.The manufacturer was made aware of this complaint through a representative of the customer.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a bipap device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged liver disease/toxicity, reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, eye irritation, nose irritation, skin irritation, respiratory tract irritation, dizziness and/or headache, hypersensitivity, nausea/vomiting, inflammatory response.Medical intervention was not specified.The manufacturer was made aware of this complaint through a representative of the customer.The device was returned to the third-party service center for further evaluation.During the evaluation of the device at the third-party service centre, the device was visually inspected and found no evidence of foam degradation.During the evaluation, secondary findings was observed.The device powered on and airflow was confirmed.The device's downloaded logs were reviewed by the third-party service center.There were 9 error codes found.The third-party service center concludes that they couldn't confirm the customer's allegation and there was no visible foam degradation and unit was corrected.In box h: evaluation method code grid, evaluation results code grid, component code grid, conclusion code grid has been updated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|