• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED RAYONE EMV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED RAYONE EMV Back to Search Results
Model Number RAO200E
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Eject (4010)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
On 25th september 2024, rayner received notification from a healthcare facility in france of an event that occurred during use of a rayone emv rao200e.The event description provided states that the lens got stuck in the injector, resulting in prolonged surgery.Note: this is the back-up lens associated with rayner case (b)(4) - fda mdr 3012304651-2024-00269.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reference (b)(4) has been allocated to this case by rayner.The event description provided states that the lens got stuck in the injector, resulting in prolonged surgery.This is the back-up lens associated with rayner case (b)(4) - fda mdr 3012304651-2024-00269.A third lens was implanted successfully within the original surgery session.There was no harm or injury to the patient as a result of the event.The device was not returned to rayner.The rayone preloaded iol injection system use risk analysis identifies the following as possible causes of "trapped/ torn lens haptic/ optic during insertion"; inadequate amount of viscoelastic; inadequate quality of viscoelastic; haptic trapped by plunger override due to fast motion; user opens closed flaps and closes again before use; plunger advanced too quickly, insertion of viscoelastic through nozzle leading to inadequate amount of viscoelastic; user removed injector from tray prior to inserting viscoelastic, causing lens to be improperly placed in cartridge; user removed injector from tray prior to closing cartridge, resulting in cartridge not being clipped properly; optic edge trapped/ damaged on closure of cartridge, sharp edge instruments and dehydration of the lens prior to implantation.Our review of production records for the rayone emv rao200e batch 044238547 showed that all manufacturing and quality checks were conducted with successful results.Without the ability to examine the device and without clear event details being provided it is not possible to establish the cause of the lens failing to inject.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAYONE EMV
Common Device Name
RAYONE EMV
Manufacturer (Section D)
RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED
the ridley innovation centre
10 dominion way
worthing, west sussex BN14 8AQ
UK  BN14 8AQ
Manufacturer (Section G)
RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED
the ridley innovation centre
10 dominion way
worthing, west sussex BN14 8AQ
UK   BN14 8AQ
Manufacturer Contact
jodie neal
the ridley innovation centre
10 dominion way
worthing, west sussex BN14 -8AQ
UK   BN14 8AQ
MDR Report Key20395173
Report Number3012304651-2024-00270
Device Sequence Number12772143
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05029867006722
UDI-Public05029867006722
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberRAO200E
Device Catalogue NumberRAO200E
Device Lot Number044238547
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/25/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/03/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-