|
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
09/19/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).D4.Product id was provided for three screws however, it is unknown which of the three screws has migrated.Therefore, the migrated screw could be any of the following: 47248603840 ¿ blunt tip screw ¿ 3200534 udi: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: apr 16, 2024 expiration date: apr 16, 2029.47248603840 ¿ blunt tip screw ¿ 3200109 (x2) udi: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: apr 8, 2024 expiration date: apr 8, 2029.47248604640 ¿ blunt tip screw - 3187126 udi: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: dec 14, 2023 expiration date: dec 14, 2028.D10.Proximal humerus, left, ã¿ 7x160mm item# 47249616107 lot# 3178812 blunt tip screw, ã¿ 4x38mm item# 47248603840 lot# 3200109 (x2) blunt tip screw, ã¿ 4x46mm item# 47248604640 lot# 3187126 cortical bone screw, ã¿ 4x24mm item# 47248612440 lot# 3203704 cortical bone screw, ã¿ 4x26mm item# 47248612640 lot# 3204761 proximal humerus nail cap, ã¿ 10.5x2.5mm item# 47248801002 lot# 3189248.G2.Report source: japan.The device will not be returned for analysis; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is completed, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an ann nail surgery was performed and after 3 weeks from the initial surgery, the surgeon found that one of the proximal screws had migrated out of the proper position.Revision surgery is being considered to remove the migrated screw.No date has been set for re-operation at this time.No further information on the reported event has been provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b4, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h10, h11.No product was returned or pictures provided; visual and dimensional evaluations could not be performed.A review of the device manufacturing records confirmed no abnormalities or deviations.Review of complaint histories identified additional similar complaints for the reported products and additional similar complaints for the reported part and lot combinations.Complaints are monitored through monthly complaint review in order to identify potential adverse trends.It can be assumed that multiple contributing factors, related to either patient condition and behavior or implantation procedure, contributed to the migration of the screws.If and to what extent any of these aspects may have influenced the migration of the screw remains unknown.An additional deeper investigation was performed which identified the design limitation of the corelock mechanism of the affixus nail as a potential contributing factor.As part of the deeper investigation, a scientific literature search was conducted and a systematic review of the outcome of intramedullary nailing for acute proximal humerus fracture showed that screw migration and perforation into the joint is the second most common complication following secondary loss of reduction.In addition, scientific literature of competitor and predicate devices were assessed.This review has shown that the affixus® natural nail® proximal humeral system performs better and/or in equal range in comparison with legally marketed similar devices.In conclusion, as the cause may be multifactorial an exact root cause could not be identified for the migration of the screw.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Diligence is completed and no further information on the reported event has been provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|