|
A perforation, pericardial effusion and bradycardic occurred.During a farapulse pulmonary vein isolation (pvi) procedure, a versacross connect for faradrive kit was selected for use.The procedure was completed using the faradrive sheath, farawave ablation catheter and versacross connect.At some point during procedure, the patient was very bradycardic (- 30 bpm).But no effusion was noted on intracardiac echocardiography (ice) and pvi procedure went unremarkable.The versacross device is not expected to be returned for analysis.Then during cavotricuspid isthmus (cti) ablation procedure indicated for typical right atrial flutter, a non-boston scientific rf ablation catheter with the vizigo sheath to ablate the cti were used.During the last rf application, the physician felt a 'pop'.At that point, the patient became hemodynamically unstable.A pericardial effusion was noted on ice.A contrast injection was attempted to aid in visualization of the perforation occurred, but the findings were inconclusive.The patient was subsequently tapped more than three times to drain the pericardial space and was intubated and received blood product transfusion.The patient was consulted by cardiothoracic surgery and admitted to the intensive unit of care (icu).The patient became bradycardic after first pulse field ablation application in the left superior pulmonary vein (lspv).On (b)(6) 2024, it was notified that the patient ultimately required surgical intervention.It was discovered that there had been a steam-pop occurred during rf ablation of the cti at the right atrium-inferior vena cava (ivc) junction.In the physician opinion, this event was unrelated to pfa and the ablation of af in the left atrium.The patient is expected to recover.In the physician opinion, there were no versacross issues, malfunctions or contributions to the patient complication noted due to versacross devices.
|