|
D2a - common device name: additional names: gbo catheter, nephrostomy, general & plastic surgery; lje catheter, nephrostomy.D2b - product code: additional product codes: gbo, lje.D4 - rpn: ult10.2-38-50-p-ring-25.5-meh-rh.E1- customer (person): title - supply chain coordinator.G4 - pma/510(k) #: k173035.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
It was reported by customer that, the ultrathane ring biliary duct drainage catheter failed.The device was returned for evaluation on 01oct2024, and upon preliminary dfa findings and photos, it was found that the hub was separated from the catheter.At this time, no adverse effects or additional procedures for the patient were reported due to this occurrence.
|
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional, relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation: it was reported by customer that, the ultrathane ring biliary duct drainage catheter failed.During an internal/external biliary drainage catheter exchange procedure, the external end of the catheter tip broke off.Another catheter was opened to finish the procedure.No harm to the patient or additional procedures for the patient were reported.Reviews of the documentation, including the complaint history, device history record, manufacturing instructions, instructions for use (ifu) and quality control procedures, as well as visual inspection of the returned product, were conducted during the investigation.The ultrathane ring biliary duct drainage catheter was received in an opened, used and damaged condition.The hub was confirmed to have separated from the catheter, with evidence of material fraying around the edge of the flare.Additionally, it was confirmed that no shaft material was between the cap and hub.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that inspection activities are in place to prevent the release of non-conforming product related to the reported failure mode.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the device found no relevant nonconformances that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.It should be noted that there were no other complaints associated with the final product lot number.Cook also reviewed product labeling: the instructions for use (ifu) [ t_multi2 rev1, multipurpose drainage catheter] states the following.How supplied: "upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." evidence gathered upon review of the dmr, ifu, dhr and device evaluation suggests that the device was not manufactured out of specification, and that there are no nonconforming devices in house or out in the field.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, it was concluded that a component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to the reported event.Based on the evidence displayed, it is possible the catheter shaft was pulled with excessive force during use, but this was not reported by the customer.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|