MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON #1 PS ALLPOLY 11MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

Catalog Number	5535A111
Medical Device Problem Code	Mechanical Problem (1384)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	Loss of Range of Motion (2032)
Date of Event	10/24/2018
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Subject had a primary apt left tka as part of a bilateral procedure on (b)(6) 2018.At the 3-month post op visit taking place on (b)(6) 2018 it was observed that rom had not improved and an mua was scheduled for and occurred on (b)(6) 2018 (mua was a bilateral mua).Two weeks following the mua it was observed that rom had improved.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding range of motion (rom) involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device remains implanted.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "i can confirm that the patient had bilateral total knee arthroplasty's performed at the same time since i was able to review the operation report and postoperative x-rays.I can also confirm that the patient underwent manipulation under anesthesia since i was able to review the operation report.I can also confirm that the patient sustained a distal femoral fracture above the right total knee arthroplasty requiring open reduction and internal fixation since i was able to review the operation report as well.Root cause analysis: the root cause of these events cannot be determined with certainty.Stiffness following bilateral total knee arthroplasty of one knee or the other is not uncommon.The causes are multifactorial including surgical technique in the way the components are sized, positioned and cemented.In this case it appears that the surgical technique was satisfactory.Patient factors such as lifestyle, activity level, bmi, and ability to comply with postoperative physical therapy and range of motion instructions contribute.In addition there are patients who tend to form scars and are more prone to arthrofibrosis.Regarding the femoral fracture, the patient sustained trauma and that was the definitive cause of the fracture.I would not attribute any causality to the implant itself.Product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: a manipulation under anesthesia was reported due to limited range of motion.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "i can confirm that the patient had bilateral total knee arthroplasty's performed at the same time since i was able to review the operation report and postoperative x-rays.I can also confirm that the patient underwent manipulation under anesthesia since i was able to review the operation report.I can also confirm that the patient sustained a distal femoral fracture above the right total knee arthroplasty requiring open reduction and internal fixation since i was able to review the operation report as well.Root cause analysis: the root cause of these events cannot be determined with certainty.Stiffness following bilateral total knee arthroplasty of one knee or the other is not uncommon.The causes are multifactorial including surgical technique in the way the components are sized, positioned and cemented.In this case it appears that the surgical technique was satisfactory.Patient factors such as lifestyle, activity level, bmi, and ability to comply with postoperative physical therapy and range of motion instructions contribute.In addition there are patients who tend to form scars and are more prone to arthrofibrosis.Regarding the femoral fracture, the patient sustained trauma and that was the definitive cause of the fracture.I would not attribute any causality to the implant itself.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.The following devices were also listed in this report: device name#triathlon ps fem component cemented ; cat#5515-f-201 ; lot#cxb7e.Device name#triathlon sym patella s27x8mm ; cat#5550l278 ; lot#lga004.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.

• Brand Name: TRIATHLON #1 PS ALLPOLY 11MM
• Common Device Name: PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
• Manufacturer (Section D): STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH; 325 corporate drive; mahwah NJ 07430
• Manufacturer (Section G): STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK; raheen business park; limerick NA ; EI NA
• Manufacturer Contact: arokiya raj ; 325 corporate drive; mahwah, NJ 07430 ; 2018315000
• MDR Report Key: 20424672
• Report Number: 0002249697-2024-01394
• Device Sequence Number: 8420463
• Product Code: MBH
• UDI-Device Identifier: 07613327043464
• UDI-Public: 07613327043464
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: TX
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K141056
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2018
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Health Professional
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial
• Report Date (Section B): 10/10/2024

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 04/30/2019
• Device Catalogue Number: 5535A111
• Device Lot Number: 253236
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Initial
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 09/19/2024
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 10/10/2024
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): No
• Date Device Manufactured: 04/17/2014
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Hospitalization; Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 61 YR
• Patient Sex: Female
• Patient Weight: 56 KG
• Patient Ethnicity: Hispanic
• Patient Race: White