|
ERIKA DE REYNOSA, S.A. DE C.V. CYCLER DRAIN BAG SET; SYSTEM, PERITONEAL, AUTOMATIC DELIVERY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
026-20226A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Peritonitis (2252)
|
| Date of Event |
10/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Plant investigation: the plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.Clinical investigation: there is a temporal relationship between peritoneal dialysis utilizing the liberty cycler set and the patient event of peritonitis.However, there is no documentation in the complaint file to show a causal relationship between the peritonitis event and the use of the cycler set.Additionally, there is no allegation of a cycler set defect reported for the event.The reported cause of the peritonitis was the patient¿s spouse saving the pd effluent in the drain bag and utilizing it for fluid in the patient¿s treatment.Drained effluent is waste and must be disposed of after treatment.Waste fluid that a peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient takes out after their dwell time should be treated like other body fluids and disposed of in the toilet.Based on the available information and no allegation or evidence of a defect, the liberty cycler set can be excluded as the cause of the patient¿s peritonitis event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2024, it was reported that this female peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient had peritonitis.Additional information was obtained through follow-up with the patient¿s peritoneal dialysis registered nurse (pdrn).The patient had a regularly scheduled appointment at the pd clinic for a lab draw on (b)(6) 2024.When the patient arrived, the patient¿s spouse reported the patient had the dry heaves for two days.The pdrn examined the patient and noted fluid in the abdomen.The spouse stated that the patient was experiencing drain alarms for three days and would just disconnect from the treatment prior to completion.The pdrn manually drained the patient and noted the drain bag to be extremely cloudy with lots of fibrin.A pd effluent culture and cell count was obtained.The patient was diagnosed with peritonitis.The nephrologist decided not to initiate antibiotic therapy until the lab results came back due to the patient¿s many drug allergies (unspecified).On (b)(6) 2024, the patient¿s white blood cell (wbc) count was >5,000.The patient was administered intraperitoneal (ip) ceftazidime and vancomycin (dose, frequency, and duration not provided) at the pd clinic under nurse supervision due to the allergy history.The culture resulted positive for coagulase negative staphylococcus (no species listed).The patient¿s antibiotics were adjusted, and the ceftazidime was discontinued.The patient had a repeat cell count and vancomycin trough drawn on (b)(6) 2024.The results are pending.The patient did not require hospitalization.The cause of the peritonitis event is contamination.The contamination was due to the patient¿s spouse saving the patient¿s drain bag from her manual daytime exchange, capping the bag, placing it on the heater tray, and instilling the contents back to the patient during ccpd treatment.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On 04/oct/2024, it was reported that this female peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient had peritonitis.Additional information was obtained through follow-up with the patient¿s peritoneal dialysis registered nurse (pdrn).The patient had a regularly scheduled appointment at the pd clinic for a lab draw on (b)(6) 2024.When the patient arrived, the patient¿s spouse reported the patient had the dry heaves for two days.The pdrn examined the patient and noted fluid in the abdomen.The spouse stated that the patient was experiencing drain alarms for three days and would just disconnect from the treatment prior to completion.The pdrn manually drained the patient and noted the drain bag to be extremely cloudy with lots of fibrins.A pd effluent culture and cell count was obtained.The patient was diagnosed with peritonitis.The nephrologist decided not to initiate antibiotic therapy until the lab results came back due to the patient¿s many drug allergies (unspecified).On (b)(6) 2024, the patient¿s white blood cell (wbc) count was >5,000.The patient was administered intraperitoneal (ip) ceftazidime and vancomycin (dose, frequency, and duration not provided) at the pd clinic under nurse supervision due to the allergy history.The culture resulted positive for coagulase negative staphylococcus (no species listed).The patient¿s antibiotics were adjusted, and the ceftazidime was discontinued.The patient had a repeat cell count and vancomycin trough drawn on (b)(6) 2024.The results are pending.The patient did not require hospitalization.The cause of the peritonitis event is contamination.The contamination was due to the patient¿s spouse saving the patient¿s drain bag from her manual daytime exchange, capping the bag, placing it on the heater tray, and instilling the contents back to the patient during ccpd treatment.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2024, it was reported that this female peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient had peritonitis.Additional information was obtained through follow-up with the patient¿s peritoneal dialysis registered nurse (pdrn).The patient had a regularly scheduled appointment at the pd clinic for a lab draw on (b)(6) 2024.When the patient arrived, the patient¿s spouse reported the patient had the dry heaves for two days.The pdrn examined the patient and noted fluid in the abdomen.The spouse stated that the patient was experiencing drain alarms for three days and would just disconnect from the treatment prior to completion.The pdrn manually drained the patient and noted the drain bag to be extremely cloudy with lots of fibrin.A pd effluent culture and cell count was obtained.The patient was diagnosed with peritonitis.The nephrologist decided not to initiate antibiotic therapy until the lab results came back due to the patient¿s many drug allergies (unspecified).On (b)(6) 2024, the patient¿s white blood cell (wbc) count was >5,000.The patient was administered intraperitoneal (ip) ceftazidime and vancomycin (dose, frequency, and duration not provided) at the pd clinic under nurse supervision due to the allergy history.The culture resulted positive for coagulase negative staphylococcus (no species listed).The patient¿s antibiotics were adjusted, and the ceftazidime was discontinued.The patient had a repeat cell count and vancomycin trough drawn on (b)(6) 2024.The results are pending.The patient did not require hospitalization.The cause of the peritonitis event is contamination.The contamination was due to the patient¿s spouse saving the patient¿s drain bag from her manual daytime exchange, capping the bag, placing it on the heater tray, and instilling the contents back to the patient during ccpd treatment.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Plant investigation: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer and the lot number was not provided.A manufacturing review was performed on the products shipped to the patient for the three (3) month time frame which immediately preceded the event occurrence date.This review included the lot numbers for all fresenius liberty cycler sets shipped to this account within the selected time frame.The entire set of lots have been sold and distributed.There were no non-conformance's or abnormalities identified during the manufacturing process which could be associated with the reported event.An investigation of the device history records (dhr) was conducted and confirmed that the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The product lots involved met all specifications for release.A review of the dhr did not reveal a probable cause for the customer complaint.As a physical evaluation could not be performed, a definitive conclusion regarding the reported incident could not be reached and a cause could not be confirmed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|