|
This complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
|
It was reported that, after a tka surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2024, it was found a piece of metal in a poly exchange and wash out procedure.This adverse event was treated by a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2024, in which an outer-grip locking fem implant impactor was exchanged.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
|
H3,h6:the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.A visual inspection of the images provided reveals a small piece of the device´s clamp fractured off.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, an undated x-ray image was provided for review and the metal fragment can be seen in the image.Post operative images of the metal fragment in hand were also provided for review.Based on the information provided we are currently unable to conclude the clinical root cause of the broken instrument.It is unknown whether it is a procedural variance or a worn device.The patient impact is determined to be the revision, and a brief post-operative recovery phase would be anticipated.Device batch number was not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history of the previous 12 months revealed similar events for the listed device, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of instructions for use for care, maintenance, cleaning and sterilization of smith & nephew orthopedics devices revealed that visually inspecting for damage or wear, including components in their disassembled state prior to re-assembly as well as ensuring components are re-assembled securely is indicated.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.H6: foreign body in patient.
|