• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3000TFX
Medical Device Problem Code Calcified (1077)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dyspnea (1816); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 09/10/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a 25mm 3000tfx aortic valve, implanted in the aortic position, was explanted after an implant duration of six (6) years and six (6) months due to stenosis and calcification.The explanted device was replaced with a 23mm 11500a aortic valve.The patient was in recovery post procedure.Per pathology report, received was a prosthetic aortic valve measuring 3.0 x 3.0 x 1.7cm with three leaflets.Yellow-pink nodular calcifications were noted and no vegetations were identified.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a 25mm 3000tfx aortic valve, implanted in the aortic position, was explanted after an implant duration of six (6) years and six (6) months due to stenosis and calcification.The patient presented with heart failure and shortness of breath.The explanted device was replaced with a 23mm 11500a aortic valve.The patient was in recovery post procedure and discharged on pod #5.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated: b4, g3, g6, h2, h6 (component code, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Calcific degeneration involves the gradual accumulation of calcium deposits on the valve leaflets.It is a disease continuum from sclerosis to chronic inflammation that leads to leaflet calcification.These calcium deposits, over time, cause the leaflets to become rigid and less flexible, which can account for failure modes such as stenosis and regurgitation.Svd is a logical and expected consequence of the chemical, mechanical, and immunological processes associated with bhv implantation.The common endpoint of all these factors is calcification and degradation.Prior investigations and extensive literature review have shown that svd is predominantly related to patient factors and implant duration rather than to manufacturing issues.Events related to device design, manufacturing, or use error tend to manifest at an earlier implant duration.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.The most likely cause is patient factors, including hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease.H11: corrected data: h6 (type of investigation).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key20446568
Report Number2015691-2024-07825
Device Sequence Number18149203
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103163667
UDI-Public(01)00690103163667(17)200504
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/04/2020
Device Model Number3000TFX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/19/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/14/2024
11/13/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/14/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/08/2024
11/18/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-