| Catalog Number |
MB3354 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/19/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that when the surgeon began implanting the mobi-c implant, it became separated from the inserter and peek cartridge.When he removed the inserter the peek cartridge was still intact with the inner pin still connecting each peek side; however, the surgeon opted not to try to reassemble it.A different implant was used and this one was discarded.There was no patient impact.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information in h6: investigation type, findings, and conclusions.Device evaluation: the device was not returned and no photos were provided, so an evaluation is unable to be performed.Root cause: a definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.This event could possibly be attributed to improper attachment to the inserter.Dhr review: the dhr was reviewed.There are no indications of manufacturing issues which would have contributed to this event and the device was likely conforming when it left highridge medical¿s control.Device usage: this device is used for treatment.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that when the surgeon began implanting the mobi-c implant, it became separated from the inserter and peek cartridge.When he removed the inserter the peek cartridge was still intact with the inner pin still connecting each peek side; however, the surgeon opted not to try to reassemble it.A different implant was used and this one was discarded.There was no patient impact.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|