• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G49874
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/08/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.E1: line 2=(b)(6).E1: additional phone: (b)(6).E3: customer occupation = unknown.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported the universa firm ureteral stent set's stent was broken prior an unspecified procedure.The issue was found when the device was removed from the package and the user cut off the tether.The procedure was completed by using another same-like device.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The device did not make patient contact.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation: it was reported the universa firm ureteral stent set's stent was broken prior an unspecified procedure.The issue was found when the device was removed from the package and the user cut off the tether.The procedure was completed by using another same-like device.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The device did not make patient contact.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturer¿s instructions (mi), quality control (qc) procedures, as well as a visual inspection or the returned device were conducted during the investigation.One stent set was returned for investigation in an open package with label.Upon inspection the stent was in 2 pieces.The stent is separated at a sideport on the body of the stent.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no related non-conformances reported for this failure mode.A complaint history database search showed no other related complaints associated with the failure mode for the complaint device lot.The information provided upon review of complaint file, device history record, complaint history, quality control documents and complaint device do not provide evidence that the device was manufactured out of specification or to suggest items in the lot or similar devices in the field or in house are nonconforming.Cook also reviewed product labeling; the ifu supplied with the device states the following in consideration of the reported failure mode: the tether should be removed if the stent is to remain indwelling longer than 14 days.Based upon the available information, inspection of the returned device, and results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause for the complaint is likely inadvertent user error.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET
Common Device Name
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key20456636
Report Number1820334-2024-01332
Device Sequence Number15402227
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier00827002498747
UDI-Public(01)00827002498747(17)270205(10)15882751
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K161236
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/09/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG49874
Device Catalogue NumberUFH-626
Device Lot Number15882751
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/08/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/29/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/15/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/09/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/05/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-