• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. HARD BASE IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 M.R.I. HARD BASE IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0604520
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Date of Event 09/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, an image was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2026) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that twenty-six days post a port placement, the catheter allegedly separated.It was further reported that the distal segment of the catheter was allegedly found to be lodged inside the patient's left pulmonary artery.Reportedly, the catheter was removed, but the distal segment of the catheter allegedly remained inside the patient's body.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one groshong catheter in two segments were returned for evaluation and one image was provided for review.Visual, microscopic, functional and tactile evaluations were performed on the returned device.A complete compound break was noted on the distal end of the attached catheter and on both ends of the distal catheter segment.The edges of the complete compound break on the distal end of the attached catheter, on the distal end of the distal catheter segment and on the proximal end of the distal catheter segment were noted to be uneven and the surface was noted to be finely granular throughout.The chest x-ray shows two segments in which the short segment was noted in the right sub-clavicular region and the longer segment is seen in the region of the left pulmonary artery.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported material separation, migration and the identified fracture issues.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3, h6 (device) h11: d4 (unique identifier (udi) #), h6 (method, result, conclusion) h11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that twenty-six days post a port placement, the catheter allegedly separated.It was further reported that the distal segment of the catheter was allegedly found to be lodged inside the patient's left pulmonary artery.Reportedly, the catheter was removed, but the distal segment of the catheter allegedly remained inside the patient's body.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
M.R.I. HARD BASE IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key20457144
Report Number3006260740-2024-05935
Device Sequence Number20782042
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741025853
UDI-Public(01)00801741025853(11)230303(17)260731(10)REGZ2583
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryMX
PMA/510(K) Number
K873213
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/02/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2026
Device Catalogue Number0604520
Device Lot NumberREGZ2583
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/18/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/13/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/15/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/09/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-