|
Section a2, a3, a3b, a4 and a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section b3: date of event: unknown, not provided section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted section e1:surgeon's email address and phone number: unknown/ asked but not available.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 10/22/2024.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned, and lens damage was observed in addition one haptic was bent.No further evaluation was performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue "dc-lens damaged" was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|