• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number APB-2-4-3D-ES
Medical Device Problem Code Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/14/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis # (b)(4): equipment used: video inspection system (m-85519), ruler (m-83361), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5 drawing(s) referenced: n/a as found condition: the axium prime coil was returned for analysis within a shipping box; within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch; within a dispenser coil and within an introducer sheath.The echelon-10 micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: no damages or irregularities were found with the introducer sheath.The axium prime pusher was found bent at ~0.8cm and ~21.2cm from the proximal end (figures c&e) and found broken at the positive load indicator with the two segments retained by the release wire (figure d).The axium prime implant coil was found already detached (figure f) and slightly damaged within the introducer sheath (figure g).Testing/analysis: the axium prime coil could not be used for resistance testing due to the damaged condition and as the implant was already detached.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in catheter¿ was confirmed as the damages found is consistent with resistance.Possible causes for coil resistance in catheter are, but not limited to, lack of hydration before procedure, user does not maintain continuous flush, damaged micro catheter, or tortuous anatomy.The returned axium prime coil was found damaged, and the pusher was found bent/broken.The customer reported the coil came out of the introducer sheath smoothly during preparation and there were no damages to the coil, therefore, it is likely the damages occurred due to advancing against the reported resistance.Customer reported devices were prepared per ifu, and vessel tortuosity as minimal.Therefore, the root cause could not be determined.The pusher was found broken and the release wire was found retracted, detaching the implant as expected by the detachment subassemblies.As the echelon-10 micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the echelon-10 micro catheter towards the resistance could not be assessed.The axium prime coil is compatible for use with the echelon-10 micro catheter.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that an axium coil encountered resistance and was stuck in the distal section of the catheter.  the patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured aneurysm of the right vertebral artery v4 with a max diameter of 3.6mm and a 1.9mm neck diameter.It was noted the patient's blood flow was normal and vessel tortuosity was minimal.It was reported that in the right vertebral v4 aneurysm, after an echelon10 was brought to the lesion via avigo, apb-2-4-3d was used for embolization.It was soon discovered that the spring coil could not be pushed out.Even after pushing the middle catheter to go upper, the spring coil could not be pushed out.It was then replaced with a new apb-2-4-3d-es and deployed successfully.The catheter and coil were not damaged.The reported device and any accessory devices were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).No patient symptoms or complications were associated with this event.Additional information was received that the coil came out of the introducer sheath smoothly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key20487295
Report Number9617601-2024-00248
Device Sequence Number4096274
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00763000313692
UDI-Public00763000313692
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K151447
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 10/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberAPB-2-4-3D-ES
Device Catalogue NumberAPB-2-4-3D-ES
Device Lot Number227825504
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/26/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/14/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/18/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-