• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO CG FUTURE BAND; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO CG FUTURE BAND; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 638BL32
Medical Device Problem Codes Calcified (1077); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001); Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 09/26/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received information that 12 years and 4 months post implant of this 32mm mitral annuloplasty band, it was explanted and replaced with a 27mm bioprosthetic valve.The reason for the replacement was not reported.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received additional information which stated that a aortic valve replacement (avr) was also performed during the same procedure for severe aortic stenosis (as) and aortic regurgitation (ar).A 21mm mosaic aortic valve was implanted during the procedure.It was indicated that the patient had severe left ventricle dysfunction and required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ecmo) and impella support post operatively.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated b2 updated b5 updated b7 updated h6.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received additional information which stated that the patient had presented with a low left ventricle ejection fraction (ef) of 20% and acute decompensated heart failure primarily based on acute onset aortic valve regurgitation.It was reported that the reason for replacement of the mitral band was severe mitral valve regurgitation.It was reported that the mitral annuloplasty band was intact but there was severe mitral annular calcification.It was stated that the patient is doing well.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CG FUTURE BAND
Common Device Name
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX  22570
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX   22570
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key20492319
Report Number9612164-2024-04792
Device Sequence Number19857667
Product Code KRH
UDI-Device Identifier00613994751782
UDI-Public00613994751782
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K052860
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/20/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/04/2014
Device Model Number638BL32
Device Catalogue Number638BL32
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/09/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/18/2024
01/30/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/21/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/15/2025
02/20/2025
Date Device Manufactured04/21/2011
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention; Life Threatening;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight63 KG
-
-