|
It was reported that the 'strings' detached from the 'sof-flex multi-length ureteral stent' during attempted patient self-removal.The stent was implanted on (b)(6) 2024, during a right flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy procedure, and the patient attempted to remove the stent, as instructed, on 02jul2024.During attempted removal, the 'strings' separated from the device and the stent remained in the patient.The patient returned to the clinical setting on (b)(6) 2024 and retained stent was confirmed via imaging.The user attempted to remove the stent with a flexible cystoscope but was unsuccessful.The stent is scheduled to be retrieved under a general anesthesia (ga) on (b)(6) 2024; no information has since been made available regarding the scheduled stent removal.Additional information regarding the event has been requested but is currently unavailable.
|
|
Investigation evaluation: description of event: it was reported that the 'strings' detached from the 'sof-flex multi-length ureteral stent' during attempted patient self-removal.The stent was implanted on (b)(6) 2024, during a right flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy procedure, and the patient attempted to remove the stent, as instructed, on (b)(6) 2024.During attempted removal, the 'strings' separated from the device and the stent remained in the patient.The patient returned to the clinical setting on (b)(6) 2024 and retained stent was confirmed via imaging.The user attempted to remove the stent with a flexible cystoscope but was unsuccessful.The stent is scheduled to be retrieved under a general anesthesia (ga) on (b)(6) 2024; no information has since been made available regarding the scheduled stent removal.The customer reported that the adverse effects due to this incident were additional procedures, ongoing pain, and stent encrustation.Additional information regarding the event was requested, but additional details were not obtained.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, specifications, manufacturing instructions (mi), and instructions for use (ifu) were conducted during the investigation.A device failure analysis was unable to be conducted as the device was not returned to cook for investigaton.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with device lot.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that that the device was manufactured to specification and there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.The product ifu, provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode.¿precautions.Do not force components during removal or replacement.If resistance is encountered, stop.Determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Stent removal: the stent may be removed by gentle withdrawal traction using endoscopic forceps or tether.How supplied: upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based upon the available information and results of the investigation cook was unable to determine the cause of the break.Cook has concluded that the cause for the complaint could not be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|