|
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG POLARSTEM STEM STD TI/HA 2 NON-CEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
75100465 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
09/30/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after a thr on (b)(6) 2024, a revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2024 because the implanted polarstem stem std ti/ha 2 non-cem was two sizes smaller than required, so it was explanted and a size 4 polar stem was implanted instead.The liner and head were explanted and replaced, as well.The patient's current health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: it was reported that, after a total hip replacement a revision surgery was performed because the implanted polarstem stem std ti/ha 2 non-cem was two sizes smaller than required, so it was explanted and a size 4 polar stem was implanted instead.The patient's current health status is unknown.The complaint device was not returned for investigation.A product evaluation was not possible.A review of the production documentation did not detect any deviation that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.The complaint history review for the complaint device revealed no additional complaints for the affected batch nor additional complaints for the same product number over the past 12 months with similar failure mode.A review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode, occurrence and severity of the reported issue.The instructions for use (81114321 rev.A) states "preoperative planning allows the surgeon to assess the choice of suitable components and possible combinations.Surgery should be planned in great detail based on analytical findings (i.E.X-ray, mri).Additional implants should be available, in case other sizes are required or if the planned implant cannot be used.Failure to carry out a proper planning could lead into choosing the wrong implant type and/or size or incorrect implant positioning".A clinical investigation was performed.A single undated, unlabeled post-implantation x-ray was provided that shows the presence of an undersized stem as indicated as the border of the stem does not contact the inner cortical wall, yet it is implanted what appears the proper depth in the femur.The adverse event was likely caused partially or wholly by the user of the product and not a mal-performance of the smith and nephew implant or an implant failure.The impact to the patient beyond the revision cannot be determined since further information was not provided.There is no evidence that the reported devices failed to meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.There is no need for further actions.Nevertheless, smith+nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.This complaint will be reopened should additional information or the device be received.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|