• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRAUB MEDICAL AG ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRAUB MEDICAL AG ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 80219
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/26/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an atherectomy and thrombectomy procedure, the catheter helix was allegedly fractured.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: a physical investigation was performed for the catheter.During physical investigation the tube was kinked at two positions, at 6.5 cm and 30.5 cm from the tip of the catheter.The head part of the catheter was missing.The helix was found broken at 1.5 cm from the tip of the catheter.A clear root cause could not be established.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an atherectomy and thrombectomy procedure, the catheter helix was allegedly fractured.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an atherectomy and thrombectomy procedure, the catheter helix was allegedly fractured.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was returned for evaluation, and a catheter was physically investigated.During physical investigation the tube was kinked at two positions, at 6.5 cm and 30.5 cm from the tip of the catheter.The head part of the catheter was missing.The helix was found broken at 1.5 cm from the tip of the catheter.A clear root cause could not be established.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3 h11: h3, h6 (conclusion) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTAREX
Common Device Name
THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRAUB MEDICAL AG
straubstrasse 12
ch-7323
wangs SG 73 23
SZ  SG 7323
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRAUB MEDICAL AG
straubstrasse 12
ch-7323
wangs SG 73 23
SZ   SG 7323
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key20520264
Report Number3008439199-2024-00190
Device Sequence Number12936983
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier07640142810278
UDI-Public(01)07640142810278(10)221964
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K211738
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number80219
Device Lot Number230006
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 09/27/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/29/2024
11/27/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/24/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/27/2024
12/25/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-