|
It was reported that a nester platinum embolization microcoil was difficult to deploy during an embolization of an abdominal artery in a patient of unknown age and gender.The doctor used a pusher stylet to advance the coil into a microcatheter.Subsequently, a 0.016-inch guidewire was used to further push the coil to the target lesion.Resistance was encountered while advancing; however, the coil and wire were still able to advance.Following attempted deployment of the coil from microcatheter tip, the wire was withdrawn.It was found that the coil and wire were stuck together, resulting in removal of the entire device including microcatheter, guidewire and the coil from the patient.Alternative cook coils were used to complete the procedure, and they were functioning well.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.It was confirmed by the user that the catheter was flushed prior to each coil deployment.
|
|
Correction: h6 - annex a.Investigation ¿ evaluation: it was reported that a nester platinum embolization micro coil was difficult to deploy during an embolization of an abdominal artery in a patient of unknown age and gender.The doctor used a pusher stylet to advance the coil into a microcatheter.Subsequently, a 0.016-inch guidewire was used to further push the coil to the target lesion.Resistance was encountered while advancing; however, the coil and wire were still able to advance.Following attempted deployment of the coil from microcatheter tip, the wire was withdrawn.It was found that the coil and wire were stuck together, resulting in removal of the entire device including microcatheter, guidewire and the coil from the patient.Alternative cook coils were used to complete the procedure, and they were functioning well.As reported, the patient did not experience any adverse effects or require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.It was confirmed by the user that the catheter was flushed prior to each coil deployment.Reviews of the documentation, including the complaint history, device history record, quality control procedures and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.Cook received one coil in a used condition.Upon visual inspection it was noted the received coil was already deployed, so tabletop testing of the device was unable to be performed.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the device found no relevant nonconformances that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.It should be noted that there were no other complaints associated with the final product lot number.Cook also reviewed product labeling: the current instructions for use [t_ce_nec_rev4] includes table with information on recommended wire guide type and size, and it recommends using a 0.018in wire guide for coils with a diameter of 0.018in.Evidence gathered upon review of the dmr, ifu, dhr, and the returned device suggests that the device was not manufactured out of specification, and that there are no nonconforming devices in house or out in the field.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, it was concluded that a component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to the reported event.It is possible that using a wire guide that is smaller than recommended in the instructions for use led to this failure, but this could not be definitively confirmed.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|