• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V3
Medical Device Problem Code Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/10/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device evaluation is ongoing.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
During inspection and testing of the videoscope, the bending tube skeleton was found protruding through the distal sheath.There were no reports of patient involvement.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the results of the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The following fields have been corrected: b3, g3.Correction is being made to previously submitted g3 - date received by manufacturer which was not late.The correct date was oct 18, 2024.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, malfunction most likely occurred due to excessive stress applied to insertion section.However, a definite root cause could not be established.The events can be detected and prevented in accordance with the following sections of the instructions for use: "operation manual_ preparation and inspection_ inspection of the endoscope inspect the external surface of the entire insertion section, including the bending section and the distal end for dents, bulges, swelling, scratches, peeling of coating, holes, sagging, transformation, bends, adhesion of foreign bodies, missing parts, protruding objects, or other irregularities.Operation manual operation_ precautions_ caution do not operate the angulation control lever with excessive force in a narrow space to the opposite direction from the bending direction while the distal end of the endoscope is not moved.The bending section may be damaged.Check the tip position of the endoscope and the shape of the bending section using fluoroscopy, etc.Do not insert the insertion tube with excessive force and twist.Do not insert the insertion tube with excessive force into the ureter or calix.The bending section may be damaged." olympus will continue to monitor the field performance of this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Common Device Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key20526514
Report Number9610595-2024-21847
Device Sequence Number9105566
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170435119
UDI-Public04953170435119
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K181451
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/02/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Model NumberURF-V3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/17/2024
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/21/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/27/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/24/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/02/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/21/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-