| Catalog Number |
ZBM14040 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Embolism/Embolus (4438)
|
| Date of Event |
10/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure, the stent allegedly embolized to ivus.It was further reported that the half of stent was snared with a large sheath and rest of the stent was explanted which left in the iliac and the groin was closed.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure in the left renal vein, the stent allegedly embolized to intravascular ultrasound.It was further reported that the half of stent was snared with a large sheath and rest of the stent was explanted which left in the iliac and the groin was closed.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the stent delivery system was not returned for evaluation and photos were not provided which leads to inconclusive results.It was reported that a 6f introducer was used for access, the device was flushed before use, the tracking vessel was not calcified, the lesion was not pre-dilated.The user believed the stent may have been undersized.An additional access was created during the completion of the procedure.Based on evaluation of the provided information, the investigation is closed with inconclusive result for stent migration.A definite root cause of the reported incident can not be identified.The placement of this stent in the renal vein represent an off-label use.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.Regarding general warning, the instructions for use states "should unusual resistance be felt at any time during the procedure, the entire system (introducer sheath or guiding catheter and stent delivery system) should be removed as a single unit".Regarding accessories, the instructions for use states "the bard s.A.F.E.6f delivery system requires a minimum 6f introducer sheath.Insert a 0.035 inch (0.89 mm) guidewire".With regards to general directions, the instructions for use states "pre-dilatation of the stricture with an appropriately sized balloon dilatation catheter is left to the discretion of the treating physician".The instructions for use states "the bard e-luminexx biliary stent is indicated for the treatment of biliary strictures resulting from malignant neoplasms".A provided table in the instructions for use indicates the expected overall stent length change (from its compressed condition within the catheter) when deployed at the recommended oversizing.H10: b5, g3, h6 (method).H11: h6 (device, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the stent delivery system was not returned for evaluation and photos were not provided which leads to inconclusive results.It was reported that a 6f introducer was used for access, the device was flushed before use, the tracking vessel was not calcified, the lesion was not pre-dilated.The user believed the stent may have been undersized.An additional access was created during the completion of the procedure.A manufacturing related issue was considered.A review of the lot history records was performed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product, and the product was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.Based on the information available, a definite root cause of the reported incident could not be identified.Based on evaluation of the provided information, the investigation is closed with inconclusive result for stent migration.A definite root cause of the reported incident can not be identified.The placement of this stent in the renal vein represent an off-label use.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.Regarding general warning, the instructions for use states "should unusual resistance be felt at any time during the procedure, the entire system (introducer sheath or guiding catheter and stent delivery system) should be removed as a single unit".Regarding accessories, the instructions for use states "the bard s.A.F.E.6f delivery system requires a minimum 6f introducer sheath.Insert a 0.035 inch (0.89 mm) guidewire.".With regards to general directions, the instructions for use states "pre-dilatation of the stricture with an appropriately sized balloon dilatation catheter is left to the discretion of the treating physician".The instructions for use states "the bard e-luminexx biliary stent is indicated for the treatment of biliary strictures resulting from malignant neoplasms".A provided table in the instructions for use indicates the expected overall stent length change (from its compressed condition within the catheter) when deployed at the recommended oversizing.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure in the left renal vein, the stent allegedly embolized to intravascular ultrasound.It was further reported that the half of stent was snared with a large sheath and rest of the stent was explanted which left in the iliac and the groin was closed.The current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|