|
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. ATELLICA IM CA 15-3; SYSTEM, TEST, IMMUNOLOGICAL, ANTIGEN, TUMOR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Low Test Results (2458)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/26/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer identified discordant (depressed) atellica im ca15-3, lot 218, patient sample results.The discordance was found after an issue with quality control (qc) results was resolved and patient samples were retested were subsequently retested on a different atellica im analyzer.The initial depressed patient results were reported, but not questioned by physician(s).Corrected reports were issued for the samples using the higher retest results.There are no allegations of patient harm, changes in treatment, or delays of diagnosis in association with this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This incident occurred outside the united states (ous).Siemens competed the investigation for an ous customer observation of imprecise quality control (qc) and discordant patient results with atellica im ca15-3 lot 218, on 1 of 2 instruments in their laboratory.The assay's instructions for use (ifu) states the following, under interpretation of results: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." siemens customer service engineer (cse) was onsite and did note observe any issues with the reagent pack on the instrument in question.The other instrument was performing as expected with same reagent lot and calibrator lot.Siemens cse reviewed the system event log.It was found that atellica im ca15-3 lot 218 reagent pack was scanned approximately 3 am on (b)(6) 2024 and irregular aspiration errors for ca15-3 calibration occurred around 9 am.The cse replaced the sample plunger and tubing and observed debris in the sample plunger.No issues were found with the sample probe and tip tray alignments.Qc was run after service and all results were within specifications.Acceptable qc has occurred consistently since instrument service.The customer is operational, and the reported issue is resolved by routine troubleshooting.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|