| Model Number |
106130-22 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had an allergic reaction to the 63b electrodes.The patient stated that he was in the process of being switched to the bhs after discussing the issue with his sales representative.It was later reported that the patient decided to pause treatment due to the irritation and is waiting until his november appointment with his doctor to get a second opinion.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d4: the expiration date is unknown as the device history record (dhr) has bas been requested but not yet provided.Section h4: the manufacturing date is unknown as the dhr has been requested but not yet provided.Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.The device history records are unable to be reviewed.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow up report will be sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section b3: as the day of the event is unknown, the event date is estimated as september of 2024.Corrected data: b3: date of event, g1: first name, last name, and email address.Additional information: b4: date of this report, d4: expiration date, g3: date received by manufacturer, h4: device manufacture date, h6: evaluation codes this follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and corrected information.The device was not returned to (b)(6) medical for evaluation.The reported event was unable to be confirmed due to limited information received from the customer.The device history record was reviewed, and no discrepancies related to the reported event were found.Root cause was unable to be determined as the necessary information to adequately investigate the reported event was not provided.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.(b)(6) medical will continue to monitor for trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had an allergic reaction to the 63b electrodes.The patient stated that he was in the process of being switched to the bhs after discussing the issue with his sales representative.It was later reported that the patient decided to pause treatment due to the irritation and is waiting until his november appointment with his doctor to get a second opinion.No further information was provided.It was later reported that the patient spoke with his surgeon on (b)(6)2024 and was told he did not need electrical stimulation.The surgeon did not think it was necessary.The patient stated that we would be discarding the remaining electrodes.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|