|
The manufacturing records were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.During the investigation no non-conformances or deviations were noted.On (b)(6) 2024 an artivion employee in device tracking was notified on an implant for a patient with a previously registered aortic valve implant and an investigation was started.This investigation is regarding an onxace-23 implanted (b)(6) 2022 in a 46-year-old male.On (b)(6) 2024 an onxace-23 was explanted and an onxace-21 was implanted.According to information provided by the surgeon the valve was explanted for severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation due to two perivalvular jets and the new valve appears to be working well.The valve was not returned for inspection and no medical records were provided.The instructions for use for the on-x valve acknowledge paravalvular leak as a potential complication following prosthetic valve replacement, which may lead to reoperation as well as explantation [ifu].Historically, major paravalvular leak occurs at a rate of (b)(4) per patient-year for rigid heart substitutes [iso 5840-2:2021(e)].The surgeon identified pvl as the root cause necessitating the explant; however, the limited information available and absence of medical records hinder a definitive conclusion regarding the underlying cause of the pvl.The most common causes of pvl are suture dehiscence, annular calcification and/or friability, infection, and technical issues during surgery.Given the available information, it remains unclear what, if any, contribution the valve itself had to the development of the pvl that led to the explant.The risk management and usability engineering file was reviewed and found to be adequate.Given the available information, it remains unclear what, if any, contribution the valve itself had to the development of the pvl that led to the explant; thus, severity and occurrence is not evaluated.The reported event will continue to be monitored for trends.No updates to the rmf are needed in response to this complaint.Risk has been reduced as low as possible and overall residual risk is acceptable.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to artivion is accurate or has been confirmed by artivion.
|