• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. VCL CT BRD VIO 8X18IN 3-0 S/A SH-1 CR; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. VCL CT BRD VIO 8X18IN 3-0 S/A SH-1 CR; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number J772D
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).H6 component code: g07002 - device not returned this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained via: - please provide lot number.=>unk - did any needle piece(s) fall into the patient?=>the needle broke during use, but it is unknown whether the piece fell into the patient.Anyway all pieces will be returning.? *if yes, was\were the needle piece(s) retrieved during the same procedure?=>yes were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)?=>unk what measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece(s)?=>unk was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece(s)?=>unk ? *if not retrieved, in what tissue structure the needle piece(s) were retained? is there any plan in place to remove the needle piece(s) in the future? please provide details.?=>unk - please provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq).=>hiromi tokuyama - please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.? =>the device has been received at sukagawa and will be shipped.Please check rmao.The manufacturing records could not be reviewed as the batch/lot number is unknown.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown surgery on an unknown date and suture was used.During the procedure, the needle was broken during use.It was a control release needle.Further details are not provided from the hp.No adverse patient consequences were reported.Additional information was requested.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 11/25/2024.H3 investigational summary: the product received for analysis was identified as product code j772d.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.The needle was noted with marks that appears to be by surgical instrument.A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the attachment area of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.The evaluation of the sample revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VCL CT BRD VIO 8X18IN 3-0 S/A SH-1 CR
Common Device Name
SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
9083863534
MDR Report Key20571121
Report Number2210968-2024-11251
Device Sequence Number8170879
Product Code GAM
UDI-Device Identifier10705031042872
UDI-Public10705031042872
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K022269
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberJ772D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/04/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/30/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/30/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/25/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-