|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, a 34mm amplatzer amulet left atrial appendage (laa) occluder was chosen for implant using a 14f amplatzer torqvue 45x45 delivery sheath.Sizing of the device was determined by transesophageal echocardiography (tee) and fluoroscopic measurements.The landing zone measurements were as follows: 0 degrees: 27.5mm; 45 degrees: 21mm; 90 degrees: 26.3mm; 135 degrees: 28mm.Tee was used during procedure.The left atrial pressure was above 12mmhg.Venous access was obtained, and the interatrial septum was crossed through an existing patent foramen ovale (pfo).The transseptal sheath was exchanged for a 14f amplatzer torqvue 45x45 delivery sheath, a pigtail was introduced, and the sheath was positioned in the laa.The device was prepped and advanced into the laa.The device was deployed and partially recaptured twice due to difficult anatomy.A tension test was performed.The device was compressed with distal end screw offset.The device appeared to meet all close criteria and released from the delivery cable.After release, the device shifted.Approximately 2 minutes after the device was released, it embolized into the left atrium (la).Transseptal access was regained using a sl1 sheath and a 16f dryseal sheath replaced the shorter venous sheath used during deployment.An agilis sheath was advanced through the 16f sheath, and a myocardial biopsy forceps device was used to attempt to retrieve the amulet, but the attempts were unsuccessful.A second transseptal puncture was performed with the sl1 sheath and brk needle.That sheath was exchanged for the agilis sheath, which was removed from the 16f sheath and re-prepped.A gooseneck snare was used through the agilis sheath, and the amulet was emergently snared.It was brought through the interatrial septum and into the left femoral vein where access was attained.A vascular cut down was performed to remove the device from the vein in the groin.The patient was stable throughout the entire procedure and left the room in stable condition.The implanter believed that the device was not fully seated in the mitral aspect of the laa, which led to the device embolization.
|
|
It was reported that the amulet device shifted upon release from delivery cable and embolized into left atrium.The embolized device did not cause a partial or complete obstruction/blockage of blood flow.Also reported that the implanter believed that the device was not fully seated in the mitral aspect of the laa, which led to the device embolization.Information from the field indicated that the sizing of the device was determined by transesophageal echocardiography (tee) and fluoroscopic measurements.Field also indicated that the device was deployed and partially recaptured twice due to difficult anatomy.Reportedly, the device appeared to meet all close criteria and released from the delivery cable.The device was not returned to abbott for analysis such that it is not possible to inspect the explanted device.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed, and the product met all specifications.It is possible that the difficult anatomy may have led to device not being fully seated in mitral aspect of laa which resulted in device embolization upon release; however, this could not be conclusively determined.The embolized device was attempted to be retrieved using sheath but the attempts were unsuccessful.A gooseneck snare was used, and the amulet was emergently snared.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.The reported surgical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances as a vascular cut down was performed to remove the device from the vein in the groin.The patient was reported to be stable throughout the entire procedure and left the room in stable condition.There were no complaints associated with any other devices from the lot.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to labeling design or manufacturing of the device.
|