| Model Number |
DCB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Scratched Material (3020)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/09/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a2, a3, a4 and a5: unknown/ not provided.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as the lens remains implanted in the eye.Section e1: reporter: middle name: unknown/ not provided.Section e1: reporter: address: address - line 2: unknown/ not provided.Section e1: reporter: telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation as the lens remain implanted in the eye.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the monofocal preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was used and as a preloaded iol it was not tempered with until it was inserted into the eye.Upon pushing the lens through the shooter, there were no any visible marks or scratches on the lens.When the lens was unfolded under the microscope, two scratches were visible.The surgeon did not remove the lens however surgeon was not impressed that the preloaded lens was already scratched.Iol still remains implanted.Review 24 hours post operatively in eye out patient department.(opd) revealed that the iol was performing as expected.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: no, however, photo was available.Section d9: returned to manufacturer: product was not received, however, photo was received.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: no, however, photo was evaluated.Device evaluation: no suspect product was received; however, a photo was provided by the customer.The customer provided photo was evaluated by a post market safety surveillance officer.It was observed 2 notch like marks, located one in mid-periphery at 2:30 and one in lens periphery zone at 3:00 in relation to the picture orientation.Due to the marks location it is not expected for the observed issues to impact the patient visual function; however, the definitive clinical impact and the incident root cause cannot be determined per a photo assessment.Manufacturing record evaluation: the manufacturing records review for this device shows that it was released within specification.Conclusion: the complaint issue "cosmetic issues" was identified during photo evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|