• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC ARROW CVC SET: 4-LUMEN 8.5FR X 16CM; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC ARROW CVC SET: 4-LUMEN 8.5FR X 16CM; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Model Number IPN918726
Medical Device Problem Codes Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/11/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that: "after pulling out, the dilatator is frayed, and the wire is bent.The procedure is performed without skin incision because they use anticoagulants which reduce the blood clotting function.These patients are awaiting major cardiac surgery.Therefore, doctors do not want the injection site to bleed.They try to introduce the dilator gently and in a helical motion.They feel that the material of the dilator is different than it was in the past." associated complaints: 3006425876-2024-01069, 3006425876-2024-01061, 3006425876-2024-01062, 3006425876-2024-01068 and 3006425876-2024-01067.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The customer returned one dilator for analysis.No obvious signs of use were observed.Visual analysis revealed that the dilator tip was bent, stretched, and widened at the distal opening.Microscopic examination confirmed the damage and revealed white stress marks around the damage.Visual analysis also revealed slight bending across the dilator body.Visual analysis could not be performed on the guide wire as it was not returned on the guide wire as it was not returned for analysis.The dilator length from the hub to the distal tip measured 102mm, which is within the specification limits of 95.2mm-108mm per the dilator product drawing.The inner diameter at the proximal end measured 1.3208mm , which is within the specification limits of 1.30mm-1.40mm per the dilator extrusion product drawing.The dilator inner diameter at the distal tip measured could not be accurately measured due to the severity of the damage.A lab inventory guide wire was inserted through the dilator tip.Minor resistance was encountered at the tip due to the damage; however, the guide wire was still able to pass.Performed per ifu statement, "use tissue dilator to enlarge tissue tract to the vein as required.Follow the angle of the guidewire slowly through the skin".The test was repeated by inserting the guide wire through the proximal end.Resistance was again encountered at the tip; however, no resistance was encountered at any of portion of the extrusion.R & d and manufacturing have been consulted regarding investigations of this nature.They stated that various factors could contribute to the observed damage to the dilator tip, including the manufacturing process and/or undue force applied unintentionally by the user during an attempted insertion.A device history record review was performed, and no relevant findings were identified.The ifu provided with the kit informs the user, "do not use excessive force when introducing guidewire or tissue dilator as this can lead to vessel perforation, bleeding, or component damage".The report of a guidewire and dilator resistance was confirmed through complaint investigation.Visual analysis revealed that the dilator tip was bent and widened, which could be a contributor to the resistance encountered by the customer.Despite the damage, all relevant dimensional and functional requirements were met, and a device history record review did not reveal any relevant findings to suggest a manufacturing issue.Despite the customer report that the defect occurred during use and the appearance of the damage to the dilator tip, the root cause cannot be determined as the guide wire involved with this complaint was not returned.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that: "after pulling out, the dilatator is frayed, and the wire is bent.The procedure is performed without skin incision because they use anticoagulants which reduce the blood clotting function.These patients are awaiting major cardiac surgery.Therefore, doctors do not want the injection site to bleed.They try to introduce the dilator gently and in a helical motion.They feel that the material of the dilator is different than it was in the past." associated complaints: 3006425876-2024-01069, 3006425876-2024-01061, 3006425876-2024-01062, 3006425876-2024-01068, and 3006425876-2024-01067.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARROW CVC SET: 4-LUMEN 8.5FR X 16CM
Common Device Name
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC
morrisville NC
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL CR, A.S.
jamska 2359/47
zdar nad sazavou 591 0 1
EZ   591 01
Manufacturer Contact
katharine tarpley
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
MDR Report Key20608173
Report Number3006425876-2024-01063
Device Sequence Number15489861
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier10801902029239
UDI-Public(01)10801902029239(11)240412(17)280531(10)71F24C1373(21)
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryEZ
PMA/510(K) Number
K862056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberIPN918726
Device Catalogue NumberCV-12854
Device Lot Number71F24C1373
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/01/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/11/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/19/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/05/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/12/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
NOT REPORTED.; NOT REPORTED.
Patient SexUnknown
-
-