MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. CEMENTED FINNED TIB. TRA SZ 2F/1T; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

Catalog Number	200-04-21
Medical Device Problem Code	Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Osteolysis (2377); Implant Pain (4561); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Date of Event	02/08/2019
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(d10) concomitant products: cemented finned tib.Tra sz 2f/1t (cat# 200-04-21 / serial# (b)(6) optetrak asy, cr cemented femoral, sz 2 (cat# 230-02-02 / serial# (b)(6).(h3): the revision reported was likely the result of prosthesis wear and osteolysis, which may have contributed to the tibial tray subsidence.Possible causes for polyethylene wear include malalignment between the implants, high contact stresses during knee flexion, third body wear, patient-related conditions, instability, or any combination of these possibilities.The extent and root cause of the prosthesis wear could not be determined as the devices were not returned for evaluation, and images were not provided.
Event or Problem Description
As reported, after about six years later from a primary surgery, the patient who had total knee arthroplasty using cr slope + tibial inserts complained knee swelling and pain, the surgeon diagnosed the wear of the tibial inserts, then revision surgery for the replacement of the tibial inserts for both side were performed (right knee revision reported).Surgeon decided that all exactech¿s component was removed and competitor¿s revision device was implanted for both side.Polyethylene particles and proliferative (growth) tissues on the surgical field were resected by the surgeon appropriately.There was no surgical delay/prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.The device is not available for evaluation.No other patient information/medical history reported.As of note: " the surgeon demands to know exactech¿s thought for below problems, and to obtain the report to describe thoughts".Concomitant products: - cemented finned tib.Tra sz 2f/1t (cat# 200-04-21 / serial# (b)(6) - optetrak asy, cr cemented femoral, sz 2 (cat# 230-02-02 / serial# (b)(6) ebi initial surgery.Serial number (b)(6) is confirmed to have been packaged in a vacuum bag that does not contain evoh.510k: k932690.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.Multiple mdr reports were filed for this event, please see associated reports: 1038671-2023-02157.The following sections were updated: d8.The following sections were corrected: b2, b5, d1.D10 (d10) concomitant products: optetrak asy,cr cemented femoral, sz 2 (cat# 230-02-02 / serial# (b)(6)).H6: the revision reported was likely the result of prosthesis wear and osteolysis, which may have contributed to the tibial tray subsidence.Possible causes for polyethylene wear include malalignment between the implants, high contact stresses during knee flexion, third body wear, patient-related conditions, instability, or any combination of these possibilities.The tibial tray subsidence observed in the provided radiographs may have been the result of insufficient bony support for the implant, poor bone quality, under sizing the tibial tray, or any combination of these possibilities.The extent and root cause of the prosthesis wear and tibial subsidence could not be determined as the devices were not returned for evaluation, and images were not provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
Event or Problem Description
As reported, after about six years later from a primary surgery, the patient who had total knee arthroplasty using cr slope + tibial inserts complained knee swelling and pain, the surgeon diagnosed the wear of the tibial inserts, then revision surgery for the replacement of the tibial inserts for both side were performed (right knee revision reported).Surgeon decided that all exactech¿s component was removed and competitor¿s revision device was implanted for both side.Polyethylene particles and proliferative (growth) tissues on the surgical field were resected by the surgeon appropriately.There was no surgical delay/prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.The device is not available for evaluation.No other patient information/medical history reported.

• Brand Name: CEMENTED FINNED TIB. TRA SZ 2F/1T
• Common Device Name: PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
• Manufacturer (Section D): EXACTECH, INC.; 2320 nw 66 court; gainesville FL 32653
• Manufacturer (Section G): EXACTECH; 2320 nw 66th ct; gainesville FL 32653
• Manufacturer Contact: geoff gannon ; 2320 nw 66th ct; gainesville, FL 32653 ; 3523771140
• MDR Report Key: 20615428
• Report Number: 1038671-2024-04254
• Device Sequence Number: 15341841
• Product Code: JWH
• UDI-Device Identifier: 10885862039699
• UDI-Public: 10885862039699
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter Country: JA
• PMA/510(K) Number: K932776
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2013
• Device Explanted Year: 2019
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Health Professional,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 03/21/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 02/12/2018
• Device Catalogue Number: 200-04-21
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 08/17/2023
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 12/03/2024
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 11/05/2024
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 03/21/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 02/18/2013
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Hospitalization; Required Intervention
• Patient Sex: Male